Facebook Twitter Instagram
    ELITETRACK
    • Home
    • Articles
      • Endurance
      • Flexibility
      • Hurdles
      • Jumps
        • High Jump
        • Long Jump
        • Pole Vault
        • Triple Jump
      • Multi-Events
      • Periodization
      • Relays
      • Sports Science
        • Biomechanics
        • Coaching Science
        • Exercise Physiology
        • Muscle Dynamics
        • Nutrition
        • Restoration
        • Sport Psychology
      • Sprints
      • Strength Training
      • Throws
        • Discus
        • Hammer
        • Javelin
        • Shot Put
    • Blog
      • Mike Young’s Blog
      • Carl Valle’s Blog
      • John Evan’s Blog
      • Antonio Squillante’s Blog
      • Vern Gambetta’s Blog
      • John Grace’s Blog
      • Ryan Banta’s Blog
      • Guest Blog
    • Forums
    • Store
    • Log in
    ELITETRACK
    You are at:Home»John Grace's Blog»Training with Percentage Ranges

    Training with Percentage Ranges

    0
    By John Grace on May 12, 2016 John Grace's Blog

    Note: In John Evans’ latest blog, he explains that Dan Pfaff suggests to use percentage ranges with nearly all of his training prescriptions. While I’m certainly not trying to challenge Pfaff’s idea (and there is probably not many that could), I’m more so sharing my experiences with using percentage ranges.

    Training in percentage ranges offers some great benefit. But, before we go full bore on this type of prescription we need to first understand what it can bring to the table, our athlete population, and if it fits our training scenario. A great benefit to training with percentage ranges is the ability to exploit the athlete’s capacity to train hard and recover while still having the capability to constrain intensity based on the time of year. Another way of putting it would be that it is flexible enough for day to day or week to week fluctuations in fatigue, but concrete enough to still progressively overload the athlete.

    I’ve had experience using this method only with our weightlifting team at Athletic Lab. Just for context, we have a wide range of ages on our team, all of whom have full time jobs or are students outside of being a competitive weightlifter. We typically have one team training plan and diverge for individuals with big competitions or minor injuries when necessary. This is why I tried it out for a little while – to give the athletes that are handling the training load well an opportunity to push pretty hard on the high end of percentages and if they’re not handling it well to stay on the low end of the prescription.

    To give an example of what I mean, I’ll outline what a basic Olympic lift progression could look like:

    Week 1 (Intro) 6×2 @ 80-85%

    Week 2 (Load) 6×2 @ 82.5-87.5%

    Week 3 (Load) 3×2 @ 82.5-87.5%, 4×1 @85-90%

    Week 4 (Unload/Test) 5×1 @ 90%+

    As you can see, you still have quite a bit of control over the intensity from week to week offering the ability to amp up or back off the training based on fatigue for that week. You can also widen or narrow the percentage gaps based on how much control you want over intensity. Only in a couple scenarios of many possible weekly combinations would this example not qualify as progressive overload – that was a small risk I was willing to take.

    In my head, I thought this would be merging the best of both worlds for our mid-20’s and masters lifters, but I had mixed thoughts about this way of planning for a couple of reasons.

    1. There are some inexperienced athletes that don’t quite know what their bodies are telling them. They don’t know what heavy or light fatigue feels like so they keep pushing when they shouldn’t or they don’t push hard enough.

    2. You might have slackers that always choose to stay on the low end of percentages even if they feel great.

    3. And then you have the experienced athletes that are not disciplined enough and always stay on the highest end of prescription (and then some) regardless of makes and misses thinking they’re superman and can handle any training load that is thrown at them.

    What I realized is that this method of loading is really meant for the experienced and disciplined athlete. At least that’s what I came away with after using it for a period of time.

    After having tried it, I like the method and can see how it can be very beneficial, but only for certain athletes and in certain scenarios. I’ve since moved to using this mostly on “easy” days when we typically have accessory work and relatively less specific exercises compared to our heavy days. I’m sure I’ll come back to it at some point.

    • Bio
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • Latest Posts
    John Grace

    John Grace

    Sport Performance Coach at Athletic Lab
    John is a Sport Performance Coach at Athletic Lab. He earned his Master's degree from Ohio University in Coaching & Sport Science. John holds his CSCS, USAW-L1, and USATF-L1. He is the former Assistant Fitness Coach of the MLS Vancouver Whitecaps FC.
    John Grace

    @john_r_grace

    Performance Coach | @ChicagoFire | I tweet about all things sport science, coaching, training, and athlete development.
    @JDMcAllister84 @ChoHodong @ben_2707 @JamesCollins50 @Jdubbwilliams7 This is at least a slight upgrade @ChoHodong https://t.co/Wi4iwjQ48d - 3 hours ago
    John Grace

    John Grace

    John Grace

    Latest posts by John Grace (see all)

    • Why NBA Players Shouldn’t be Criticized for Resting in the Regular Season - March 22, 2017
    • Q&A with Dan Pfaff - January 6, 2017
    • Horizontal vs. Vertical Forces Debate… Debunked? Q&A with Mike Young - November 16, 2016
    • Velocity Based Training Q&A with Dan Baker - October 29, 2016
    • Should We Use High Pulls for Power Development? - September 22, 2016
    dan pfaff olympic weightlifting progression recovery training
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Over Recovery Syndrome

    How much is enough?

    15 Ways to Sleep Well After a Late Night Workout

    Like Us On Facebook
    - Facebook Members WordPress Plugin
    Highest Rated Posts
    • A Review of 400m Training Methods 79 votes, average: 4.92 out of 579 votes, average: 4.92 out of 579 votes, average: 4.92 out of 579 votes, average: 4.92 out of 579 votes, average: 4.92 out of 5 (4.92 out of 5)
    • 2008 Olympics: Usain’s Insane 100m 67 votes, average: 4.96 out of 567 votes, average: 4.96 out of 567 votes, average: 4.96 out of 567 votes, average: 4.96 out of 567 votes, average: 4.96 out of 5 (4.96 out of 5)
    • Top 10 Myths of Sprinting Mechanics 66 votes, average: 4.74 out of 566 votes, average: 4.74 out of 566 votes, average: 4.74 out of 566 votes, average: 4.74 out of 566 votes, average: 4.74 out of 5 (4.74 out of 5)
    • 14 reasons why Jamaica is the Sprint Capitol of the World 59 votes, average: 4.85 out of 559 votes, average: 4.85 out of 559 votes, average: 4.85 out of 559 votes, average: 4.85 out of 559 votes, average: 4.85 out of 5 (4.85 out of 5)
    • 12 Reasons to Squat Year Round 58 votes, average: 4.86 out of 558 votes, average: 4.86 out of 558 votes, average: 4.86 out of 558 votes, average: 4.86 out of 558 votes, average: 4.86 out of 5 (4.86 out of 5)
    • 6 Reasons Why All Athletes Should Sprint 63 votes, average: 4.32 out of 563 votes, average: 4.32 out of 563 votes, average: 4.32 out of 563 votes, average: 4.32 out of 563 votes, average: 4.32 out of 5 (4.32 out of 5)
    • 4 Tips for Keeping up with Sport Science Research 65 votes, average: 4.03 out of 565 votes, average: 4.03 out of 565 votes, average: 4.03 out of 565 votes, average: 4.03 out of 565 votes, average: 4.03 out of 5 (4.03 out of 5)
    • Loren Seagrave’s thoughts on Absolute Strength 54 votes, average: 4.80 out of 554 votes, average: 4.80 out of 554 votes, average: 4.80 out of 554 votes, average: 4.80 out of 554 votes, average: 4.80 out of 5 (4.80 out of 5)
    • 6 Reasons Why Jamaicans Dominate the Sprints 50 votes, average: 4.78 out of 550 votes, average: 4.78 out of 550 votes, average: 4.78 out of 550 votes, average: 4.78 out of 550 votes, average: 4.78 out of 5 (4.78 out of 5)
    • Developing Endurance in Speed-Power Athletes 58 votes, average: 4.09 out of 558 votes, average: 4.09 out of 558 votes, average: 4.09 out of 558 votes, average: 4.09 out of 558 votes, average: 4.09 out of 5 (4.09 out of 5)
    Recent Topics
    • 办理英国阿伯丁大学毕业证AU成绩单+Q微19254
    • (1925465786微信/q)专业解决留学生毕业
    • 咨询【美国UC文凭】毕业证Q/微信19254657
    • 办理美国罗格斯大学毕业证RU成绩单+Q微19254
    • 【购买澳洲文凭澳洲学历】Q微1925465786办
    About

    ELITETRACK is one of the longest standing sport training & conditioning sites on the web. We feature over 250 articles and 1000s of blog posts from some of the most knowledgeable and experienced track & field coaches on the web.

    Recent Posts
    • How is Cristiano Ronaldo Still in Peak Physical Condition at 35?
    • If You Think You Have It Figured Out
    • Muscles Firing – Where is the Switch?
    • The Companions of the Compendium Podcast is Here!!
    • Volume
    Forum Activity
    • AvatarPablo25 on How and when do hamstring injuries occur?
    • AvatarJosh Hurlebaus on Josh Hurlebaus Masters Training Log
    • AvatarJosh Hurlebaus on Josh Hurlebaus Masters Training Log
    • AvatarJosh Hurlebaus on Josh Hurlebaus Masters Training Log
    • AvatarJosh Hurlebaus on Josh Hurlebaus Masters Training Log
    ELITETRACK by Human Performance Consulting, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 2015.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.